Possibilities of Direct Mind Interface
How to have a direct interface with the mind? There are a number
of current ways to assess the activities of the brain (see Table) or
perhaps a completely new method will be developed. There is
also the possibility of more invasive methods such as placement of
electrodes in the brain. This is perhaps exemplified in the cochlear implant to
correct human deafness .
Physical Property
Measured: |
Method: |
Advantages: |
Disadvantages: |
Radioactive tracer |
PET positron emission tomography |
Good spatial resolution |
Complex, expensive, slow |
Magnetic resonance |
fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging DTI
diffusion tensor imaging |
Good spatial resolution |
Complex, expensive, slow |
Electrical field |
EEG electroencephalogram ERP event-related
potentials |
Portable equipment, fast |
Poor spatial resolution |
Impedance |
EIT electrical impedance tomography |
Portable equipment, fast |
Weak signal, Poor spatial resolution |
Magnetic field |
MEG magnetoencephalography |
fast |
Weak signal, complex, expensive |
Optical properties |
NIR Near-infrared light DOI Diffuse Optical
Imaging EROS Event Related Optical Signal |
Portable equipment, fast |
Weak signal, Poor spatial
resolution |
The methods that have good spatial resolution, which image blood
volume and oxygen saturation, are slow after the fact measure of
brain activity. While methods that have good temporal
resolution usually have poor spatial resolution. There are two
methods that may have good spatial resolution and temporal
resolution - but the brain has very weak signals of these.
These two methods are magnetic fields and the event related optical
signal. There is another possibility but little is know about
it yet, and that is fMRI of detect signals from sodium, phosphorus,
carbon, nitrogen and oxygen the metabolic building blocks of brain
function and human thought. The first instrument in the world
to do this is being built in its own building at the Center for MR Research at the
University of Illinois at Chicago using the largest magnet field
for MRI of 9.4 Tesla, which is 100,000 times the Earth's magnetic
field.
For every electrical field there is a corresponding magnetic
field. All the electrical fields in the brain have a
corresponding magnetic field. These magnetic fields are very
weak and require very sensitive means to measure them. Special
detectors called superconducting quantum interference devices
(SQUIDs), cooled to the temperature of liquid helium (about -273°C),
can measure these tiny magnetic fields. With sophisticated
electronics and software, the outputs of the SQUIDS are used to
localize the source of the brain activity within millimeters. The
resulting functional brain data may then be overlaid on an
anatomical image produced by, for example, an MRI.
Near-infrared light (NIR) can penetrate the brain to sufficient
depths so as to allow functional mapping. Changes in tissue
oxygenation associated with brain activity modulate the absorption
and scattering of these NIR photons. By measuring the optical
changes at various wavelengths in the NIR band qualitative measures
of brain activity can be obtained. The NIR response in the
brain is comprised of two signals. There is a slow response (approx.
5-8 s) as a result of attenuation changes due to localized blood
volume and oxygenation changes and a fast response (of the order of
50 - 300 milliseconds) perhaps due to changes in the scattering
properties of the neuronal membranes during firing. This EROS (Event
Related Optical Signal) is more directly related to neural activity
and may correlate with EEG activity. However, present
instruments must average 1000 trials or more to bring the signal out
of the noise.
|